I've been looking at some of your images resurrecting old glass (in some cases, very old glass!) in more than just the immediate way of 'look at that lovely image how sharp how soft wonderful bokeh' etc. Imo antique lenses are as good as modern lenses: sharp wide open and excellent bokeh (at F9.0!) plus: they have sexy looks and names, and are much cheaper! The Hugo Meyer Wide Angle Aristostigmat 7 inch F9 is relatively young, 1920s, but ticks all the boxes: The Hugo Meyer Aristoplanat No 6 210/7.7 is not much younger but still going strong:
Made with a7 + Hugo Meyer Aristoplan No 1 150/7.2, another centinarian. Made with a7 + Hugo Meyer Wide Angle Aristostigmat 4,75 inch F9? I don't think so. #3 was made with a modern lens: CZ Makro-Planar 50/2.Ĥ Glunz Modell 500 with Meyer Doppel Anastigmat Helioplan 165/4.5 STF quality imho.ģ a7s with bellows and Hugo Meyer Wide Angle Aristostigmat 4,75 inch F9 Made with the a7s and a Hugo Meyer Wide Angle Aristostigmat 4,75 inch F9 F9, ca 1930. This was made with the a7 and a Hugo Meyer Doppel Anastigmat No 2 180/5.5 F5.5, a lens more than 100 years old (1911). Have lenses really become much better since the early 1900s?
0 kommentar(er)
